Do Cats and Dogs Have Emotions? Anthropomorphization and Its Meaning.
Airfare Daily Deals eCigarettes Eyeglasses Hotels Jewelry Online Backup Online Dating Online Printing Online Tickets Skin Care Textbook Rentals Vitamins Web Hosting Weddings
Find thousands of shopping-related forums
SEARCH

Do Cats and Dogs Have Emotions? Anthropomorphization and Its Meaning.

Do your Dogs and Cats have emotions? This article explores why it is difficult to characterize emotion from a scientific standpoint.

Anthropomorphization is defined as the attribution of human characteristics to nonhuman objects and animals. For example, Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny are a mouse and rabbit respectively but they walk and talk like humans. Also the pet rock is simply a rock that we glue google eyes to and give names. Do you believe that your dog or cat has moods, that they are angry or happy or sad? To label your pets with human emotions is anthropomorphization. This is not a problem as anyone who has ever spent time with an animal knows that they most certainly do have emotional states that they can quite effectively convey. The problem begins to develop when field scientist begin ascribing these emotions to their subjects as emotional states are unquantifiable by the scientific method. More on this later, let’s take a look at anthropomorphization in history.

The idea of anthropomorphization dates back to the earliest of cultural artifacts that we consider the movement from necessity to art about 35,000 years ago. That is, objects made for their own sake as opposed to objects made for subsistence purposes. The oldest of these artifacts is the Hohlstien-Stadel Lionman statue from what is now called Germany (see fig #1).

Fig #1. A mammoth-ivory statuette representing a half-lion, half-man figure (Hohlstein-Stadel, Germany, Aurigcacian 40,000-28,000 years ago)

Anthropomorphization is a cross cultural phenomenon that knows no geographic or anachronistic bounds. Cultures all over the world throughout time have incorporated anthropomorphized figures and tied them to religion. The Egyptians and Native Americans are both very good example of this as all of their deities were variations of human animal hybrids (see fig #2). The Greeks had centaurs and pans in their mythology, even Christianity has this imagery, and Satan himself is often depicted with horns, a tail and cloven hooves. As a primatologist, my favorite of these in the Hindu God Hanuman, the naughty monkey god (see fig #3).

Fig #2. The Egyptian pantheon

Fig #3. Hanuman, The naughty monkey god of the Hindu’s

As I mentioned earlier, anyone who has spent time around animals knows that they have emotions, the problem come when a researcher tries to use interpret emotional states in a scientific context. For example: Jane Goodall writes about an incident in her widely acclaimed book “In the Shadow of Man”. An adult female chimpanzee dropped her newborn from the tree tops and it fell to its death on the forest floor. The Female chimp wailed and cried as she scooped up the body and carried it around for two weeks. She stopped eating and eventually died of starvation. Anyone with any sense knows, and Jane Goodall reported as much, that the mother of the infant died of a broken heart and remorse. In my own field studies of chimpanzees I have observed many emotional states brought on by closeness of family, the simple joy of play among the young and even shame when one fell out of a tree and was laughed at by the others.

The problem comes when, as scientists, we try to convey these observed emotional states in a paper. If during the peer review process a peer believes you are anthopomorhizing it could discredit your entire hypothesis. There is no means currently of accurately gauging or measuring the emotional state of an animal. Frans De Waal is a primatologist who is working with Bonobos to rectify this scientific short coming. No one denies that Bonobos have emotions, the problem becomes; are they the same emotions that we are feeling?  Our own emotions are currently our only basis for comparison and the scientific method is based on observable repeatability and there is no repeatability when it comes to emotional states in other animals.

It all boils down to a simple question. Does your dog love you, does it miss you when you are gone, is it happy when you return? The obvious answer is yes, we can see it in their behavior, but can these states be qualified in a scientific framework and proven? The answer, sadly, is no.

Check out my Travel Blog "On The Move" at: onthemove819.blogspot.com/

Need an answer?
Get insightful answers from community-recommended
experts
in Biology on Knoji.
Would you recommend this author as an expert in Biology?
You have 0 recommendations remaining to grant today.
Comments (4)

Very nice article. Goes well with another article written recently about how people sometimes become too complacent around wild animals, possibly because of the movies, etc. that give these animals human characteristics.

seymour

It is pretty obvious their emotions are similar to ours... we're animals, too. We're chemically and anatomically similar.

Please don't use "it" when referring to animals. Animals (including us) aren't objects. Using "it" as a determiner for non humans creates (or IS) a social stigma, according to which it is perfectly acceptable to treat non humans the way we would treat objects.

seymour

It is pretty obvious their emotions are similar to ours... we're animals, too. We're chemically and anatomically similar.

Please don't use "it" when referring to animals. Animals (including us) aren't objects. Using "it" as a determiner for non humans creates (or IS) a social stigma, according to which it is perfectly acceptable to treat non humans the way we would treat objects.

yaniv arava

Beautiful pictures !! i would like to have your permission to use the "cat & the dog" pic as a reference to one of my paintings in the future. i will give a credit to your site and let other people know about it.

thanks in advance...Yaniv.

ARTICLE DETAILS
RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE KEYWORDS